Warning: Kindly do not make the mistake of taking any hints from the heading as to where this discussion went. It is adulterated heavily with my own opinion. But then...I barely speak in class. :)
Having read Shriyaa's post on "Develoment", I find myself extremely discouraged because my ability to express my thoughts in the form of words is not even close to being as good as hers. Also, as unfortunate as I am, I was allocated the task of writing the summary right before exam week which is why I may not be able to do justice to it. But I'm going to keep the promise i made to myself and try nonetheless.
In the last class, we continued the discussion that had been initiated earlier about the pros and cons of living in a city and a village or a town. As a topic for discussion this one's definitely an improvement, in my opinion, over "If you had the power, what would you like to do to change the society as a whole?" considering the fact that the no. of words that came out of my mouth was the third highest in the room, following Sriram Sir and no points for guessing, Devbrat Rathore, in that order I might add. ;)
After an hour of thinking up points in favour of both cities and towns/villages and slowly elaborating each one of them, what we had( by "we", I mean the 12 people in the room whose brains were actually processing all the information...Pulkit slept through half the class and doesn't qualify :) ), looked something like this...
Cities :
1. More job opportunities and money which eventually leads to a better standard of living.
2. Better facilities for healthcare, sanitation etc.
3. More options for entertainment and pleasure like theatres, malls and eateries.
4. Exposure(?) : That's what it says in my notes but I'm not sure i remember what it was about. Help yourself. :P
5. The kinds of work are diverse.
Towns/ Villages :
1. Comparitively lower levels of pollution of all kinds.
2. Safer to live in. Sir wasn't entirely convinced about this one and hence decided to rethink it. So he went to the person who originally suggested it and that person, unfortunately, was me. To be honest even I wasn't entirely convinced about this point when i blurted it out. But thanks to Devbrat, who gave an example from his own life that lasted 5 long minutes, Sir finally accepted it. Devbrat recalled that when he was living in Bhopal, he once saw a thief in his colony and shouted for help but got no response. He exclaimed that if the same thing had happened in a small town or a village, everyone from the neighbourhood would have gathered to help him.
3. Stronger relationships exist as the people live in a close knit society and interact on a daily basis. They share all their happiness and sorrows with each other.
4. The environment is cleaner and greener than in cities.
5. With lesser work load, emotional support and a general sense of well being, the stress level is automatically reduced greatly.
6. Towns and villages are peaceful. Life is not too fast and you get time for yourself and your family.
After listing these points, the task assigned to us was to analyze how crucial each point was, to figure out what direction would the scales tilt in.
Starting with towns and villages, we examined that pollution directly affects the physical as well as the mental health of a person. Sir asked us to imagine going to work in a city with immense air pollution and horns blaring all around. Someone(Kaushik I think) pointed out that if the money was good, it was not that big a problem. So we ended up not marking pollution as an extremely crucial factor.
Safety, as we realized after some debate, was a result of stronger relationships with the people around you which meant both these points were pretty important. Check!
Environment also turned out to be a crucial enough factor but some might argue that a city might not necessarily be less greener than a town or a village.
Coming to the next point, we were asked to examine whether we'd give up the good money and facilities for a stress-free life to which I happily gave a textbook reply that it is dependent on the level of stress. If the level of stress is high but not so high that it would drive me crazy, I'd go for the money. Check!
On the other hand, the most essential factors in favour of cities, according to Sriram Sir, were Opportunities/Money and the kind of work. No one argued.
At the very end, we compared the crucial points in both cases and reached the conclusion that we cannot clearly say that living in cities is better than living in towns or villages or vice versa. The opinions would differ from person to person. Hence, heading justified. ;)
Writer comments : This small report may seem to be too self centered and pointless. For the former, I'd say that I'm not too visible in the other posts, so I thought that this may be my only chance. Also, I'm writing almost a week(that too exam week) after the class so the so-called "exam pressure" could have affected my memory. There's no justification good enough to get me out of trouble but just this once, I wanted to do this for myself and not just because I had to.
Nicely written Prateek! Well done. It brought the underlying theme of what we discussed in the class. However, I would like to just clarify the theme a little bit more.
ReplyDeleteThe discussion should not considered as something like city vs village, but rather a comparison between something that we consider as developed and something that we don't (especially in India). After the discussion, we saw that almost all the good things that we considered missing in the city (developed) were in fact, crucial and couldn't be ignored in a setting that we consider as developed.
Factually, I think we all agreed that no-pollution was extremely crucial to our good health. Yeah, it is true that a point was raised that some people were more tolerant to pollution or stress and wouldn't mind it for a few extra bucks. But, even after considering this "relatively", I think it was still considered a crucial factor.
Your title was creative, but I still have slight problem with it for two reasons, 1) it's not reflective of the contents of the article very much, and 2) even though the blog is informal, we could still exercise some restrain with the choice of words/phrases. But, surely, it is up to you.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all,
ReplyDeleteIn a village ,most of them share a history, a descent . Its not that common for people to migrate from one village to another .Hence it is mostly that one family to knows the other for generations together .It is due to this that social relations are very strong and betrayals do take a heavy dent in these type of intimate relationships.
Also a village is very very small. One can walk or cycle from one end to the other. Its not the same with cities where in one needs some motor vehicle in order to commute between different parts of the cities and hence pollution becomes an unavoidable thing unless some scientific advancement comes into place.
More over I would not prefer cities and villages to become something intermediate.
I would prefer cities to be themselves and villages to be themselves(underdeveloped).
This is because development does come at the cost of the mentioned above and I would not prefer villages to compromise on them.
Hence people who want some change can go to from villages to cities and vice versa.Ofcouse some minor improvements like sanitation,etc is acceptable but nothing more than that!
I totally agree with prateek (except for the sleeping part since I had my ICPC finals the previous day till late night :P).
ReplyDeleteI think there is more exposure in cities because it is more multicultural as people from different backgrounds and different parts of the country migrate to cities whereas in a town/village only the people of a few communities live together.
Also the kind of work in cities is more of manufacturing and management based whereas in villages(at least in India) it is majorly farming and cottage industries which require physical labour.
There are also many healthcare facilities and better sanitation facilities in cities which indirectly makes a city safer(in case of flu outbreak etc.) than villages.
Even though both cities and villages have their plus and minus points, I would prefer living in cities because of the more lively lifestyle, more facilities and amenities.
@Prateek: I WILL HAVE MY REVENGE!!!!
yes it is right,people in city pay a cost of there health to enjoy fecility.one has to think a way to make city people more secure & related.
ReplyDelete